DB2 :: RE: Testing rerad cursor for status with predicate
Author: John F Dutcher Subject: H-m-m using "TRUE" gives same result Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 10:39 pm (GMT 5.5) ........ so it just seems as though my COBOL or DB2 environment doesn't tolerate...
View ArticleDFSORT/ICETOOL :: RE: Converting Variable block file to Fixed block file
Author: Arun Raj Posted: Fri May 19, 2017 11:39 pm (GMT 5.5)Code:TOLEN(2)Should be 80? Might want to edit and remove your user/site-specific(?) stuff from the post._________________Arun...
View ArticleDB2 :: RE: Testing rerad cursor for status with predicate
Author: prino Subject: Re: Understood ......... Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 12:16 am (GMT 5.5)John F Dutcher wrote:but my employer wants to prevent -501s and -502s..... not code logically in response to...
View ArticleDB2 :: RE: Testing rerad cursor for status with predicate
Author: John F Dutcher Subject: You guessed it.......... !!!! Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 12:39 am (GMT 5.5) .....that's what we do !!! All that said...... I gather all agree...trying to test the state of...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: Release quantity that was allocated via LIKE= subparm
Author: steve-myers Posted: Sat May 20, 2017 2:20 pm (GMT 5.5) RLSE as specified in the DD statement SPACE parameter is not a data set attribute. In order for space release to occur through JCL two...
View ArticleDB2 :: RE: DB2 - TERMINATE utility
Author: farhad_evan Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 8:12 am (GMT 5.5) If you have DB2 Query Monitor on your system you can find it so easy, But if you don't have I think you must try to read DB2 logs.
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: Redefine SYS1.PROCLIB
Author: farhad_evan Subject: Redefine SYS1.PROCLIB Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 10:54 pm (GMT 5.5) Hi Do to kack of space I need to redefine SYS1.PROOCLIB .Do i need to consider about something before do...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: Redefine SYS1.PROCLIB
Author: Robert Sample Posted: Mon May 22, 2017 11:42 pm (GMT 5.5)Quote:Do i need to consider about something before do it ? How many LPARs share the SYS1.PROCLIB data set? Is SYS1.PROCLIB indirectly...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: EMAIL using IEBGENER - SMTP
Author: parasmalik20 Subject: EMAIL using IEBGENER - SMTP Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 12:19 am (GMT 5.5) Hi All, I am trying to email using IEBGENER and it is working fine, the only problem is the person...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: EMAIL using IEBGENER - SMTP
Author: Robert Sample Subject: Reply to: EMAIL using IEBGENER - SMTP Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 12:37 am (GMT 5.5) Read RFC 2821 to find out the details of what you can -- and cannot -- do in SMTP....
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: EMAIL using IEBGENER - SMTP
Author: parasmalik20 Subject: EMAIL using IEBGENER - SMTP Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 12:52 am (GMT 5.5) Thanks , Robert. I will do so.
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: Redefine SYS1.PROCLIB
Author: steve-myers Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 1:56 am (GMT 5.5)Robert Sample wrote:... If the lack of space (which is what I assume you meant by "kack of space" in your post) is no secondary allocation,...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: Redefine SYS1.PROCLIB
Author: Robert Sample Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 2:30 am (GMT 5.5)Quote:Do i need to consider about something before do it ?I think you've got your answer -- if you redefine SYS1.PROCLIB, there are...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: Redefine SYS1.PROCLIB
Author: farhad_evan Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 9:28 am (GMT 5.5) Hi Thanks for your suggestion and sorry if the post not clear enough. SYS1.PROCLIB is on one LPAR and it isn't indirectly cataloged.Quote:...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: Redefine SYS1.PROCLIB
Author: enrico-sorichetti Subject: Reply to: Redefine SYS1.PROCLIB Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 11:47 am (GMT 5.5) check if SYS1.PROCLIB members have the ISPF statistics and delete them ( the statistics )...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: Redefine SYS1.PROCLIB
Author: Willy Jensen Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 2:01 pm (GMT 5.5) Do you have your JES2 set up with dynamic PROCLIB? Then you could create a new one and add it in flight, then move procedures from...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: Redefine SYS1.PROCLIB
Author: steve-myers Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 4:46 pm (GMT 5.5)farhad_evan wrote:Hi Thanks for your suggestion and sorry if the post not clear enough. ... we don't have PDS86 on our site. So I think...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: EMAIL using IEBGENER - SMTP
Author: parasmalik20 Subject: Re: Reply to: EMAIL using IEBGENER - SMTP Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 6:03 pm (GMT 5.5)Robert Sample wrote:Read RFC 2821 to find out the details of what you can -- and cannot...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: EMAIL using IEBGENER - SMTP
Author: Robert Sample Subject: Reply to: EMAIL using IEBGENER - SMTP Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 6:35 pm (GMT 5.5) Glad to hear you got it working._________________TANSTAAFL The first rule of code reuse...
View ArticleJCL & VSAM :: RE: Redefine SYS1.PROCLIB
Author: farhad_evan Posted: Tue May 23, 2017 8:08 pm (GMT 5.5) @enrico-sorichett Thanks for your reply Could you please explain me why I must to delete statistics of SYS1.PROCLIB members ? @Willy...
View Article