Author: magesh23586
Subject: Reply to: Icetool or Joinkeys example to compare two files
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:37 am (GMT 5.5)
Rohit,
Your include condition is wrong, it should be as below
Even if you have corrected the include condition what would be the end result ?
SYMNAMES solutions is always better than Joinkeys because, SYMNAMES solution can be archived in 2 Pass and Joinkey required three Pass and additional build statements.
The only thing we need to make sure is, SYSMNAMES should always have one record and that can be achieved by having STOPAFT=1 option. Also we can set a return code 04 for empty file, so that we can stop executing next step.
Bill Woodger,
What is your opinion ?
_________________
Regards,
Magesh
Subject: Reply to: Icetool or Joinkeys example to compare two files
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2016 2:37 am (GMT 5.5)
Rohit,
| Rohit wrote: | ||
|
Your include condition is wrong, it should be as below
| Code: |
INCLUDE COND=((1,8,CH,EQ,21,8,CH,OR,1,8,CH,EQ,29,8,CH),AND, (21,2,CH,EQ,C'12',AND,29,2,CH,EQ,C'12')) |
Even if you have corrected the include condition what would be the end result ?
| Rohit wrote: |
We can discuss on choices as we want but for your point |
SYMNAMES solutions is always better than Joinkeys because, SYMNAMES solution can be archived in 2 Pass and Joinkey required three Pass and additional build statements.
The only thing we need to make sure is, SYSMNAMES should always have one record and that can be achieved by having STOPAFT=1 option. Also we can set a return code 04 for empty file, so that we can stop executing next step.
Bill Woodger,
What is your opinion ?
_________________
Regards,
Magesh