Author: steve-myers
Subject: Re: Reply to: CONTIG for performance?
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:32 am (GMT 5.5)
There are a few other places where this is true. For example, the JES2 checkpoint and SPOOL data sets must be CONTIG.
Subject: Re: Reply to: CONTIG for performance?
Posted: Thu Jun 15, 2017 7:32 am (GMT 5.5)
| Robert Sample wrote: |
| I don't think performance is the issue any more -- but RACF, for example, has CONTIG coded in the sample JCL member RACJCL because the RACF database must be allocated in one extent. |
There are a few other places where this is true. For example, the JES2 checkpoint and SPOOL data sets must be CONTIG.