Author: steve-myers
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:20 am (GMT 5.5)
Mr. Woodger is correct about testing the new program very carefully.
The method you used to combine the two programs may have introduced overheads that would pretty much negate any TCB CPU time savings, leaving a small SRB time savings. Since there is no practical way for an ordinary program to control the amount of SRB CPU time the program uses, I would discount this "savings."
Still, it looks to me you got back 15 minutes or so. Not bad at all!
Posted: Tue Mar 21, 2017 5:20 am (GMT 5.5)
Mr. Woodger is correct about testing the new program very carefully.
The method you used to combine the two programs may have introduced overheads that would pretty much negate any TCB CPU time savings, leaving a small SRB time savings. Since there is no practical way for an ordinary program to control the amount of SRB CPU time the program uses, I would discount this "savings."
Still, it looks to me you got back 15 minutes or so. Not bad at all!