Author: Robert Sample
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 3:05 am (GMT 5.5)
According to your 3 rules, yes record 2 matches both -- so why do you think it should only match record 8?
Since you did not post any of the logic you are using, how can we help you? Are the rules prioritized?
_________________
TANSTAAFL
The first rule of code reuse is that the code needs to be worth re-using.
"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: premature optimization is the root of all evil." -- Donald Knuth
Posted: Wed Feb 22, 2017 3:05 am (GMT 5.5)
| Quote: |
| Based on the sequence and matching logic record 1 is not matching with any previous record and assigned a unique value 009, when record 2 is processed it matched with two unique value 008 & 009. |
Since you did not post any of the logic you are using, how can we help you? Are the rules prioritized?
_________________
TANSTAAFL
The first rule of code reuse is that the code needs to be worth re-using.
"We should forget about small efficiencies, say about 97% of the time: premature optimization is the root of all evil." -- Donald Knuth