Author: steve-myers
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:56 am (GMT 5.5)
dneufarth still doesn't get it. The failing line probably was something like
to get the ASMA141E error. In other words, the OI was considered a label, and HLASM thought UNPACK+1,X'FO' was an instruction of some sort.
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:56 am (GMT 5.5)
| dneufarth wrote: |
| machine instruction looks like 96F0bddd. 'b' = base register and 'ddd' = displacement 96FO (opcode & immediate data) is the offender in the error msg At least that's what I recall from years ago. Steve, good insight in your post. I went straight to solve the problem. |
dneufarth still doesn't get it. The failing line probably was something like
| Code: |
| OI UNPACK+1,X'FO' |