Author: RahulG31
Subject: Reply to: Why develop for mainframe?
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:38 am (GMT 5.5)
It is funny how somebody shows/tells/represents the facts.
See this question in the fact/pdf Rohit shared:
And then they go on to say that
Using the same facts one could also say that:
OR (to get someone more worried)
It's the way somebody wants you to look at the facts.
I don't think it's worth mentioning that the facts are printed by a particular organization (I am not blaming them but may be they are only printing what interests them and that's fair).
Subject: Reply to: Why develop for mainframe?
Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2016 12:38 am (GMT 5.5)
It is funny how somebody shows/tells/represents the facts.
See this question in the fact/pdf Rohit shared:
| Quote: |
| How many more years do you think your organization will continue to rely on mainframe applications? |
| Quote: |
| Fewer than 5 Years or don't know - 13% 5 - 10 Years - 55% 10 - 20 Years - 30% More than 20 Years - 2% |
And then they go on to say that
| Quote: |
| 87% of enterprises that currently use mainframes expect to continue doing so for more than five years. |
Using the same facts one could also say that:
| Quote: |
| 68% of enterprises that currently use mainframes expect to get rid of it in next 10 Years |
OR (to get someone more worried)
| Quote: |
| 98% of enterprises that currently use mainframes expect to get rid of it in next 20 Years |
It's the way somebody wants you to look at the facts.
I don't think it's worth mentioning that the facts are printed by a particular organization (I am not blaming them but may be they are only printing what interests them and that's fair).