Author: Arun Raj
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 6:19 pm (GMT 5.5)
magesh23586,
I would assume that the above note by Bill in one of the old topics still holds true for your "optimum + simple" solution-1, which involves SORT and SUM.
Moreover, I would think we don't have to restart/abend on a daily basis. So if the copy solution runs fine for 99% of the time, I don't see any problem with that, unless the job fails every day.
Edit: Your second "solution" still has unused bytes if you have not realized it yet.
_________________
Arun
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Love is like an hourglass, with the heart filling up as the brain empties. -Jules Renard
Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 6:19 pm (GMT 5.5)
| Bill Woodger wrote: |
| So any solution involving SORT is absurd: wasteful of resources. Unless absolutely necessary :-) |
I would assume that the above note by Bill in one of the old topics still holds true for your "optimum + simple" solution-1, which involves SORT and SUM.
Moreover, I would think we don't have to restart/abend on a daily basis. So if the copy solution runs fine for 99% of the time, I don't see any problem with that, unless the job fails every day.
Edit: Your second "solution" still has unused bytes if you have not realized it yet.
_________________
Arun
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Love is like an hourglass, with the heart filling up as the brain empties. -Jules Renard